Prior to Work:

Before I start writing chapter to chapter (and start reading like a madman), I continue to have insights and possible theories. I would like to briefly address one particular idea regarding forces.

The below considerations adhere to a force similar to vertical thrust, such as that of a rocket or jet thrusters of a VTOL aircraft.

Forces are the result of a warped geometry imposed on the fabric of space/time by a spinning field.

Forces are cones of warped space/time, that spiral out from a single point, forming a field that moves through space/time.

These cones are formed on Earth due to the already warped space/time geometry due to Earth's gravity field. This kind of force is directional in nature due to its thrusting effect (an explosion would still expand force in all directions but be constricted and effected by gravity).

Further, one could think of these cones as mini blackholes that form the conic jets of force (just as full scale blackholes have similar energenic jets of matter) by absorbing and redirecting matter into energy (or most likely on a quantum level converting energy into matter).

The most concentrated effect "felt" by the force would be a perpendicular line extending from the center point that the cone extends from.

Forces may also be toroids in higher dimensions that have a dynamic motion to them, either a spin or a simple expansion. The resulting effect on the lower dimension would be an outward expanding cone of force (or some other lower dimensional topological structure - they form cones on Earth due to the gravity as stated above).

Working with higher dimenional structures is tricky as any motion experienced on the lower dimension could be the result of the existential prescence of the higher dimensional object. For example, a hypersphere passing through a common area of 3-dimensional space would be experienced on the 3rd physical dimension as a dynamic sphere, one that expands and then collapses as the hypersphere passes by. Lower ordered aspects of any dimensional object relate to the lower dimensional structure: in this case let's look at the hypersphere again. The surface of a hypersphere is a sphere as the surface of a sphere is a circular plane. There are other correlations like this. Intersecting objects are lower dimensional. Just as a sphere can be intersected (and thought of as a construction of) by a circular plane, a hypersphere is intersected by a sphere. Further any motion by a higher dimensional object is experienced on the lower dimension in a higher order (i.e. a constant expanding circle in a higher dimension, say the 4th physical, would result in an accelerated expanding sphere in the lower, in this case the 3rd physical).

The main foundation of this theory is that all forces are based on a geometry or topology imposed on space/time. This geometry is a result of a dynamic field (one that is in motion, most likely accelerated). This idea is born from Newton's bucket of water thought experiment (introduced to me by Brian Greene in his book, "Fabric of the Cosmos" - see references list), in which a spinning bucket of water forms a warped concave surface on the water. This is a result of the force imposed on the surface of the water due to the accelerated motion of the body of water relative to what Newton called "absolute space". I am attempting to apply this same thinking to all forces. In place of the body of water we have space/time; and the concave surface area due to the accelerated motion is now a dynamic field imposing a warping effect on the "surface" of space/time. This all occurs on a higher dimenion (perhaps) and the resulting topology generates the force we experience. Proof of such a theory would lie in working out the math that could stand in place of the explainations of forces that we already have. If a correlation between the geometry of such a "cone of force" and the physical effects of said force (f=ma) is present, then my theory should "hold water".